4.7 Article

Discursive Synergies for a 'Great Transformation' Towards Sustainability: Pragmatic Contributions to a Necessary Dialogue Between Human Development, Degrowth, and Buen Vivir

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 304-313

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025

关键词

Transformation discourses; Strategic dialogue; Sustainable development; Post-development; Socio-ecological transition

资金

  1. Paul + Maria Kremer Foundation
  2. FONDECYT [1160186]
  3. European Research Council [GA 695446]
  4. Spanish government [CSO2014-54513-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a growing awareness that a whole-societal Great Transformation of Polanyian scale is needed to bring global developmental trajectories in line with ecological imperatives. The mainstream Sustainable Development discourse, however, insists in upholding the myth of compatibility of current growth-based trajectories with biophysical planetary boundaries. This article explores potentially fertile complementarities among trendy discourses challenging conventional notions of (un)sustainable development-Human Development, Degrowth, and Boon Vivir - and outlines pathways for their realization. Human Development presents relative transformative strengths in political terms, while Degrowth holds keys to unlocking unsustainable material-structural entrenchments of contemporary socio-economic arrangements, and Buen Vivir offers a space of cultural alterity and critique of the Euro-Atlantic cultural constellation. The weaknesses or blind spots ('Achilles heels') of each discourse can be compensated through the strengths of the other ones, creating a dialogical virtuous circle that would open pathways towards a global new Great Transformation. As one of the main existing platforms for pluralist and strong-sustainability discussions, Ecological Economics is in a privileged position to deliberately foster such strategic discursive dialogue. A pathway towards such dialogue is illuminated through a model identifying and articulating key discursive docking points.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据