4.7 Article

Phylogeny and species traits predict bird detectability

期刊

ECOGRAPHY
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 1595-1603

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.03415

关键词

avian communication; cross-validation; life history traits; phylogenetic regression; point-count surveys; probability of detection

资金

  1. Environment and Climate Change Canada
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act
  4. Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Inst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Avian acoustic communication has resulted from evolutionary pressures and ecological constraints. We therefore expect that auditory detectability in birds might be predictable by species traits and phylogenetic relatedness. We evaluated the relationship between phylogeny, species traits, and field-based estimates of the two processes that determine species detectability (singing rate and detection distance) for 141 bird species breeding in boreal North America. We used phylogenetic mixed models and cross-validation to compare the relative merits of using trait data only, phylogeny only, or the combination of both to predict detectability. We found a strong phylogenetic signal in both singing rates and detection distances; however the strength of phylogenetic effects was less than expected under Brownian motion evolution. The evolution of behavioural traits that determine singing rates was found to be more labile, leaving more room for species to evolve independently, whereas detection distance was mostly determined by anatomy (i.e. body size) and thus the laws of physics. Our findings can help in disentangling how complex ecological and evolutionary mechanisms have shaped different aspects of detectability in boreal birds. Such information can greatly inform single- and multi-species models but more work is required to better understand how to best correct possible biases in phylogenetic diversity and other community metrics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据