4.5 Article

Characteristics and Triggering Conditions for Naturally Deposited Gravelly Soils that Liquefied Following the 2008 Wenchuan M-w 7.9 Earthquake, China

期刊

EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 1091-1111

出版社

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH INST
DOI: 10.1193/032017EQS050M

关键词

-

资金

  1. Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration [2018A01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51669005, 41741011]
  3. Key National Research Fund of Jointly Cooperative Program of China-USA [2016YFE0105500]
  4. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2016GXNSFAA380117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 2008 M-w 7.9 Wenchuan, earthquake caused naturally deposited gravelly soils to liquefy over a wide area. Although liquefaction of gravely soils is recognized by the geotechnical profession, observations of liquefaction and nonliquefaction case histories within the literature are few. Through several years of systematic study following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake (M-w 7.9), 92 locations of gravel liquefaction were identified, described, and mapped. These locations lie within an approximately 3,000 km(2) area of the Chengdu Plain. Peak ground accelerations estimated at the sites range from 0.15 g to 0.49 g. Taken collectively, these studies reveal the necessary conditions for liquefaction triggering in gravelly materials. Grain size analyses indicates that the ejecta was much finer than the gravels that liquefied. Gravel contents of liquefied soils ranged from 5% to more than 85%. The liquefied gravelly soils were loose, but their measured shear wave velocities range from 133 m/s to 267 m/s, with corrected values ranging from 154 m/s to 31 4m/s. The unique depositional conditions under Chengdu Plain provide favorable conditions for extensive liquefaction of gravelly soils. The shallow soil profiles consist of a 0.5 m to 5.5 m impermeable soil (i.e., the capping layer) overlying gravels ranging in thickness from a few meters to hundreds of meters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据