4.6 Review

Safety Profile of Benznidazole in the Treatment of Chronic Chagas Disease: Experience of a Referral Centre and Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis

期刊

DRUG SAFETY
卷 41, 期 11, 页码 1035-1048

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0696-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. ISCIII (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) [RD16/0027/0020, RD16/0027/0002]
  2. FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IntroductionBenznidazole is the preferred drug for treatment of Chagas disease. However, it is toxic and of limited value in chronic infection.ObjectiveWe aimed to estimate the rates of and factors related to adverse reactions (ARs) to benznidazole and treatment discontinuations (TDs).MethodsA meta-analysis was performed using an electronic search of the published literature with no language restrictions until June 2017. Prospective studies were included of chronically infected patients in which at least one treatment arm included benznidazole. Data were added from a prospective cohort of patients with Chagas disease at our centre (January 2007-June 2017). Weighted rates of ARs and TDs were estimated, and potentially related factors were analysed.ResultsSome 413 studies were found, from which we chose 42 (nine clinical trials and 33 observational studies, including ours), comprising data for 7822 patients. The weighted rate of ARs to benznidazole was 44.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.2-51.2). ARs were more frequent in adults than in children (51.6 vs. 24.5%), with the most common being skin reactions (34%), gastrointestinal complaints (12.6%) and neurological symptoms (11.5%). Grade 4 ARs were recorded in 3% of cases. The weighted rate of TDs was 11.4% (95% CI 8.5-14.5); TDs were more frequent in adults than in children (14.2 vs. 3.8%). In our cohort, only female sex was related to an increased rate of ARs but not to TDs.ConclusionBenznidazole had a poor tolerability profile, with a high incidence of TDs, especially in adult patients and women. Optimised dosing schedules and/or new drugs are urgently needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据