4.5 Article

Comparative genomic analyses reveal the features for adaptation to nematodes in fungi

期刊

DNA RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 245-256

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsx053

关键词

nematophagous fungi; Esteya vermicola; comparative genome; genome feature; adaptation and evolution

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-profit Research Institute of CAF of China [CAFYBB2017SZ003]
  2. Institute Special Fund for Basic Research, Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment, and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry [CAFRIFEEP201403]
  3. State 863 Project - Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2012AA101503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nematophagous (NP) fungi are ecologically important components of the soil microbiome in natural ecosystems. Esteya vermicola (Ev) has been reported as a NP fungus with a poorly understood evolutionary history and mechanism of adaptation to parasitism. Furthermore, NP fungal genomic basis of lifestyle was still unclear. We sequenced and annotated the Ev genome (34.2 Mbp) and integrated genetic makeup and evolution of pathogenic genes to investigate NP fungi. The results revealed that NP fungi had some abundant pathogenic genes corresponding to their niche. A number of gene families involved in pathogenicity were expanded, and some pathogenic orthologous genes underwent positive selection. NP fungi with diverse morphological features exhibit similarities of evolutionary convergence in attacking nematodes, but their genetic makeup and microscopic mechanism are different. Endoparasitic NP fungi showed similarity in large number of transporters and secondary metabolite coding genes. Noteworthy, expanded families of transporters and endo-beta-glucanase implied great genetic potential of Ev in quickly perturbing nematode metabolism and parasitic behavior. These results facilitate our understanding of NP fungal genomic features for adaptation to nematodes and lay a solid theoretical foundation for further research and application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据