4.6 Article

Feature-based analysis of cell nuclei structure for classification of histopathological images

期刊

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 152-162

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2018.03.008

关键词

Histopathological images; Nuclei structure; Feature analysis; Feature selection methods

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC [61771080, 61108086, 61571069]
  2. Fundamental and Advanced Research Project of Chongqing [cstc2016jcyjA0043, cstc2016jcyjA0134]
  3. Chongqing Social Undertaking and People's Livelihood Guarantee Science and Technology innovation Special Foundation [cstc2016shmszx40002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pathological examination of histopathological images remains the main method of cancer diagnosis. We proposed a novel automatic feature-based analysis scheme for classification of the histopathological images. An animal model of intestinal carcinogenesis-multiple intestinal neoplasia mouse model was used to evaluate the feasibility of the nuclear structure feature for detecting early-stage carcinogenesis and assessing cancer risk. Firstly, the cell nuclei are segmented based on collaborate cell localization and the improved morphology method. Then several types of features, including shape features, statistical features and textual features (Gabor and Markov random field features) are extracted. Feature selection methods including wrapper, filter and the maximum relevance-minimum multicollinearity are applied to obtain the optimal feature set. Experimental results show that the proposed segmentation method can automatically segment histopathological images and has effective segmentation results. The maximum relevance-minimum multicollinearity method outperformed all other methods in term of classification accuracy. The textual features can effectively improve the characterization of cell nuclei structure and feature selection methods can get better classification results. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据