期刊
PHILOSOPHY COMPASS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 636-645出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12249
关键词
-
类别
资金
- Arts and Humanities Research Council [AH/K003615/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15J03906] Funding Source: KAKEN
- AHRC [AH/K003615/1] Funding Source: UKRI
In this paper we review two debates in the current literature on clinical delusions. One debate is about what delusions are. If delusions are beliefs, why are they described as failing to play the causal roles that characterise beliefs, such as being responsive to evidence and guiding action? The other debate is about how delusions develop. What processes lead people to form delusions and maintain them in the face of challenges and counter-evidence? Do the formation and maintenance of delusions require abnormal experience alone, or also reasoning biases or deficits? We hope to show that the focus on delusions has made a substantial contribution to the philosophy of the mind and continues to raise issues that are central to defining the concept of belief and gaining a better understanding of how people process information and learn about the world.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据