4.5 Article

Suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and tumor necrosis factor-alpha level by lycopene is comparable to methylprednisolone in acute pancreatitis

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 601-607

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.01.131

关键词

GSH; Myeloperoxidase; Nitric oxide; Pancreatitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Oxidative stress and inflammation may play a key role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis (AP). Lycopene, a natural carotenoid, has antioxidant scavenger capacity and inhibits inflammation in many experimental models. Aim: The study was designed to investigate whether lycopene can ameliorate l-arginine-induced pancreatitis in rats and to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms of these effects. Methods: Forty-eight adult male Wistar rats were divided into: control group (vehicle, orally, 10 days), AP group (3 g/kg l-arginine, single i.p. injection, on day 10th of the experiment), lycopene group (50 mg/kg) and methylprednisolone group (30 mg/kg). Lycopene and methylprednisolone were given orally, once daily for 10 days prior to l-arginine injection. Rats were sacrificed 24 h after l-arginine injection. Inflammation/oxidative stress and pancreatic markers were assessed. Pancreatic histopathological studies were done. Results: Lycopene group showed a significant reduction in tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), myeloperoxidase activity, and down-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene expression. Pancreatic nitric oxide concentration was reduced and pancreatic GSH was increased in lycopene group. Serum alpha-amylase and lipase activities were reduced by lycopene treatment. The histology of pancreas was improved in lycopene group as well as methylprednisolone group. Conclusion: Lycopene prior treatment proved anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects against AP rat model via different mechanisms. (c) 2018 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据