4.5 Article

Insulin sensitivity and complications in type 1 diabetes: New insights

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 8-16

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.8

关键词

Type 1 diabetes; Insulin sensitivity; Vascular complications; Hyperfiltration; Cystatin C; Creatinine; Glomerular filtration rate

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR001082] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL113029] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite improvements in glucose, lipids and blood pressure control, vascular complications remain the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes. For that reason, there is a need to identify additional risk factors to utilize in clinical practice or translate to novel therapies to prevent vascular complications. Reduced insulin sensitivity is an increasingly recognized component of type 1 diabetes that has been linked with the development and progression of both micro- and macrovascular complications. Adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes have reduced insulin sensitivity, even when compared to their non-diabetic counterparts of similar adiposity, serum triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, level of habitual physical activity, and in adolescents, pubertal stage. Reduced insulin sensitivity is thought to contribute both to the initiation and progression of macro-and microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. There are currently clinical trials underway examining the benefits of improving insulin sensitivity with regards to vascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Reduced insulin sensitivity is an increasingly recognized component of type 1 diabetes, is implicated in the pathogenesis of vascular complications and is potentially an important therapeutic target to prevent vascular complications. In this review, we will focus on the pathophysiologic contribution of insulin sensitivity to vascular complications and summarize related ongoing clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据