4.6 Article

Personality in Bonobos

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 1430-1439

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0956797615589933

关键词

behavior; chimpanzee; evolution; Pan paniscus; Pan troglodytes; primate

资金

  1. University of Antwerp
  2. University of Edinburgh Development Trust [2828]
  3. Daiwa Foundation [6515/6818]
  4. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [25290082, 25118005]
  5. Cooperation Research Program of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University
  6. Flemish Government
  7. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS36605, NS42867]
  8. National Center for Research Resources [RR00165]
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25118005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To better understand human and chimpanzee personality evolution, we obtained trait ratings of personality for 154 captive bonobos (similar to 80% of the U.S. and European population). We found factors that we labeled Assertiveness, Conscientiousness, Openness, Agreeableness, Attentiveness, and Extraversion. The interrater reliabilities and test-retest reliabilities for these factors were comparable to those found in humans and other species. Using orthogonal targeted Procrustes rotations, we compared the bonobo dimensions with those of three samples of captive chimpanzees. Overall congruence coefficients indicated a fair degree of similarity; at the factor level, there was good evidence for Assertiveness, Conscientiousness, Openness, and Agreeableness in the chimpanzee samples; evidence for Attentiveness and Extraversion was poor. These findings suggest that, as expected given their close phylogenetic relationship, bonobo personality structure resembles chimpanzee personality structure in some respects. However, divergent evolution, perhaps as a result of socioecological differences between bonobos and chimpanzees, also appears to have shaped personality structure in these species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据