4.3 Article

Variance, inter-trait correlation, heritability and trait-marker association of herbage yield, nutritive values, and morphological characteristics in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.)

期刊

CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE
卷 66, 期 9, 页码 973-984

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/CP15070

关键词

cultivar; heading date; herbage quality; linkage disequilibrium; pasture; polymorphism

资金

  1. Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources
  2. Geoffrey Gardiner Dairy Foundation
  3. Meat and Livestock Australia
  4. New Zealand Agriseeds, Christchurch, New Zealand, through the Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) is one of the most important temperate forage grasses on a global basis. The present study estimated trait variance, inter-trait correlation and broad-sense heritability (H-2) for herbage yield, nutritive values and morphological characteristics of Italian ryegrass, and analysed associations between these traits and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. A field-based, spaced-plant nursery experiment was conducted to assess 960 genotypes from seven cultivars and breeding lines, in a randomised complete block design with four replicates. Significant correlations, broad ranges of variation and significant genotypic variance components were identified for 18 measured phenotypic traits. Moderate H-2 estimates (0.36-0.52) were obtained for nutritive values, compared with low to high H-2 estimates (0.20-0.69) for yield over five cuttings, and moderate to high H-2 estimates (0.40-0.78) for morphological traits. Within- and among-cultivar variation ranged from 40.0% to 95.1% and 4.9% to 60.0%, respectively, depending on different traits. Association analysis identified 65 significant SNP-trait gene associations involving multiple genomic regions, which warrant further validation. The implications of trait correlation and heritability for selection and improvement are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据