4.5 Article

Stability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System, Manual Ability Classification System, and Communication Function Classification System

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 1026-+

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13903

关键词

-

资金

  1. CIHR [MOP # 119276] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute [Grant # 5321] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimTo determine the stability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), and Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) over 1-year and 2-year intervals using a process for consensus classification between parents and therapists. MethodParticipants were 664 children with cerebral palsy (CP), 18months to 12years of age, one of their parents, and 90 therapists. Consensus between parents and therapists on level of function was 92% for the GMFCS, MACS, and CFCS. A linearly weighted kappa coefficient of 0.75 was the criterion for stability. ResultsKappa coefficients varied from 0.76 to 0.88 for the GMFCS, 0.59 to 0.73 for the MACS, and 0.57 to 0.77 for the CFCS. For children younger than 4 years of age, level of function did not change for 58.2% on the GMFCS, 30.3% on the MACS, and 39.3% on the CFCS. For children 4 years of age or older, level of function did not change for 72.3% on the GMFCS, 49.1% on the MACS, and 55% on the CFCS. InterpretationThe findings support repeated classification of children over time. The kappa coefficients for the GMFCS are attributed to descriptions of levels for each age band. Consensus classification facilitates discussion between parents and professionals that has implications for shared decision-making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据