4.6 Article

A potential robust antiviral defense state in the common vampire bat: Expression, induction and molecular characterization of the three interferon-stimulated genes-OAS1, ADAR1 and PKR

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 95-107

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2018.04.006

关键词

Desmodus rotundus; Innate immunity; ISGs; OAS1a; OAS1b; ADAR1; PKR

资金

  1. European funds (ERDF/FEDER) [31575]
  2. Institut Pasteur through a Transversal Research Program [PTR499]
  3. European Commission [REGPOT-CT-2011-285837-STRonGer]
  4. Investissement d'Avenir [ANR-10-LABEX-25-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bats are known to harbor many zoonotic viruses, some of which are pathogenic to other mammals while they seem to be harmless in bats. As the interferon (IFN) response represents the first line of defense against viral infections in mammals, it is hypothesized that activation of the IFN system is one of the mechanisms enabling bats to co-exist with viruses. We have previously reported induction of type I IFN in a cell line from the common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus, upon polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C)) stimulation. To deepen our knowledge on D. rotundus' IFN-I antiviral response, we molecularly characterized three interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), OAS1, PKR and ADAR1, closely implicated in the IFN-I antiviral response, and tested their functionality in our cellular model. We first found that D. rotundus encoded two OAS1 paralogs, OAS1a and OAS1b, and that the functional domains of the four ISGs characterized were highly conserved with those of other mammals. Despite their significant transcription level in the absence of stimulation, the transcription of the four ISGs characterized was enhanced by poly(I:C). In addition, the transcription of OAS1a and OAS1b appears to be differentially regulated. These findings demonstrate an active ISG antiviral response in D. rotundus in which OAS1b may play an important role. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据