4.7 Article

Defective endothelial cell migration in the absence of Cdc42 leads to capillary-venous malformations

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 145, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.161182

关键词

Vascular malformations; Cdc42; Cell migration; Endothelial axial polarity; Angiogenesis; Proliferation

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Foundation [CAN2015/771]
  2. Vetenskapsradet [VR2015-00550]
  3. European Research Council [2011-294556, EU-ERC269073]
  4. Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse [2012.0272]
  5. Fondation Leducq [14-CVD-02]
  6. FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions [317250]
  7. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  8. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte [EDU/2934/2009]
  9. Flemish Government
  10. Federaal Wetenschapsbeleid [IUAP] [P7/03]
  11. Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie
  12. Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsrad

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formation and homeostasis of the vascular system requires several coordinated cellular functions, but their precise interplay during development and their relative importance for vascular pathologies remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the endothelial functions regulated by Cdc42 and their in vivo relevance during angiogenic sprouting and vascular morphogenesis in the postnatal mouse retina. We found that Cdc42 is required for endothelial tip cell selection, directed cell migration and filopodia formation, but dispensable for cell proliferation or apoptosis. Although the loss of Cdc42 seems generally compatible with apical-basal polarization and lumen formation in retinal blood vessels, it leads to defective endothelial axial polarization and to the formation of severe vascular malformations in capillaries and veins. Tracking of Cdc42-depleted endothelial cells in mosaic retinas suggests that these capillary-venous malformations arise as a consequence of defective cell migration, when endothelial cells that proliferate at normal rates are unable to re-distribute within the vascular network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据