4.5 Article

Short-term mortality risk of serum potassium levels in acute heart failure following myocardial infarction

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvv026

关键词

Serum potassium; Heart failure after myocardial infarction; Mortality

资金

  1. Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
  2. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF12OC1015957] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Diuretic treatment is often needed in acute heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) and carries a risk of abnormal potassium levels. We examined the relation between different levels of potassium and mortality. Methods and results From Danish national registries we identified 2596 patients treated with loop diuretics after their first MI episode where potassium measurement was available within 3 months. All-cause mortality was examined according to seven predefined potassium levels: hypokalaemia < 3.5 mmol/L, low normal potassium 3.5-3.8 mmol/L, normal potassium 3.9-4.2 mmol/L, normal potassium 4.3-4.5 mmol/L, high normal potassium 4.6-5.0 mmol/L, mild hyperkalaemia 5.1-5.5 mmol/L, and severe hyperkalaemia: > 5.5 mmol/L. Follow-up was 90 days and using normal potassium 3.9-4.2 mmol/L as a reference, we estimated the risk of death with a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard model. After 90 days, the mortality rates in the seven potassium intervals were 15.7, 13.6, 7.3, 8.1, 10.6, 15.5, and 38.3%, respectively. Multivariable-adjusted risk for death was statistically significant for patients with hypokalaemia [ hazard ratio (HR): 1.91, confidence interval (95% CI): 1.14-3.19], and mild and severe hyperkalaemia (HR: 2, CI: 1.25-3.18 and HR: 5.6, CI: 3.38-9.29, respectively). Low and high normal potassium were also associated with increased mortality (HR: 1.84, CI: 1.23-2.76 and HR: 1.55, CI: 1.09-2.22, respectively). Conclusion Potassium levels outside the interval 3.9-4.5 mmol/L were associated with a substantial risk of death in patients requiring diuretic treatment after an MI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据