4.4 Article

CYP3A Activity and Expression in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

期刊

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
卷 43, 期 10, 页码 1484-1490

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.115.065979

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-136909]
  2. Ontario Graduate Scholarship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of liver disease in the Western world, given its association with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Medications are widely used in NAFLD to manage comorbid conditions, and there is significant interest in developing new drug therapies to treat the disease. Despite this, little is known about the effects of NAFLD on drug metabolism. We examined the activity and expression of the major drug-metabolizing enzyme subfamily, CYP3A, in subjects with NAFLD as well as in mouse and cellular models. CYP3A activity was determined in healthy volunteers and subjects with biopsy-proven NAFLD by oral midazolam phenotyping and measurement of plasma 4 beta-hydroxycholesterol, an endogenous metabolic biomarker. CYP3A4 transcriptional activity, metabolic activity, and expression were also assessed in a mouse and cellular model of NAFLD. Subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) had 2.4-fold higher plasma midazolam levels compared with controls. Plasma 4 beta-hydroxycholesterol was 51% and 37% lower than controls in subjects with simple steatosis and NASH, respectively. Fibrosis was associated with 57% lower plasma 4 beta-hydroxycholesterol levels than controls. Furthermore, hepatic CYP3A4 mRNA expression in NASH was 69% lower than control livers. CYP3A4 gene luciferase activity in the livers of NAFLD mice was 38% lower than that of controls. Lipid-loaded Huh7 human hepatoma cells had a 38% reduction in CYP3A4 activity and 80% lower CYP3A4 mRNA expression compared with the control. CYP3A activity is reduced in human NAFLD in addition to mouse and in vitro cell models of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据