4.7 Article

Kinetic analysis for cyclic CO2 capture using lithium orthosilicate sorbents derived from different silicon precursors

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 47, 期 27, 页码 9038-9050

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8dt01617h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506112]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M610910]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of Li4SiO4 was synthesized using LiNO3 and six different silicon precursors. The precipitated-silica-derived Li4SiO4 presented the highest CO2 capacity in a 10 h sorption test, and ZSM-5-derived Li4SiO4 demonstrated the most rapid CO2 sorption. The CO2 sorption kinetics predominantly followed the nucleation mode and could be accurately described by the Avrami-Erofeev model. The Avrami-Erofeev model provided an in-depth analysis of correlation between sorption performance and material properties. Both the nucleation speed and nucleation dimensionality affected the overall sorption kinetics. The kinetics and pore-size distribution suggest that the sorption kinetics was dependent on the quantity of similar to 4 nm-pores which favors nucleation dimensionality. For the cyclic tests, the precipitated-silica-derived sample presented the poorest performance with the capacity decreasing from 31.33 wt% at the 1st cycle to only 11.52 wt% at the 30th cycle. However, the sample made from fumed silica displayed an opposite trend with the capacity increasing from 19.90 wt% at the 1st cycle to 34.23 wt% at the 30th cycle. The radically distinct behaviour of samples during cycles was on account of the alternation of sorption kinetics. The decrease in similar to 4 nm-pores after cycles was responsible for the decrease of nucleation dimensionality for the precipitated-silica-derived sample. The rearrangement during cycles could enrich the pores of similar to 4 nm for the fumed silica-derived sample, which improved the nucleation growth, thus enhancing the kinetics with cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据