4.7 Article

Rationalizing the sign and magnitude of the magnetic coupling and anisotropy in dinuclear manganese(III) complexes

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 47, 期 34, 页码 11820-11833

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8dt01410h

关键词

-

资金

  1. SERB [EMR/2014/000247]
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. IITB-Monash Academy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have synthesised twelve manganese(III) dinuclear complexes, 1-12, in order to understand the origin of magnetic exchange (J) between the metal centres and the magnetic anisotropy (D) of each metal ion using a combined experimental and theoretical approach. All twelve complexes contain the same bridging ligand environment of one mu-oxo and two mu-carboxylato, that helped us to probe how the structural parameters, such as bond distance, bond angle and especially Jahn-Teller dihedral angle affect the magnetic behaviour. Among the twelve complexes, we found ferromagnetic coupling for five and antiferromagnetic coupling for seven. DFT computed the J and ab initio methods computed the D parameter, and are in general agreement with the experimentally determined values. The dihedral angle between the two Jahn-Teller axes of the constituent Mn-III ions are found to play a key role in determining the sign of the magnetic coupling. Magneto-structural correlations are developed by varying the Mn-O distance and the Mn-O-Mn angle to understand how the magnetic coupling changes upon these structural changes. Among the developed correlations, the Mn-O distance is found to be the most sensitive parameter that switches the sign of the magnetic coupling from negative to positive. The single-ion zero-field splitting of the MnIII centres is found to be negative for complexes 1-11 and positive for complex 12. However, the zero-field splitting of the S = 4 state for the ferromagnetic coupled dimers is found to be positive, revealing a significant contribution from the exchange anisotropy - a parameter which has long been ignored as being too small to be effective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据