4.7 Article

Water oxidation by a copper(II) complex: new findings, questions, challenges and a new hypothesis

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 47, 期 27, 页码 9021-9029

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8dt01876f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences
  2. National Elite Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper(II) complexes are very promising catalysts for water oxidation. Herein new findings on the water-oxidizing activity of a few copper(II) complexes under water oxidation conditions are reported. Copper compounds in this study are copper(II) phthalocyanine-3,4',4 '',4 '''-tetrasulfonic acid tetrasodium salt (1), the product from the hydrolysis of Cu(II)tptz(H2O)(CH3COO)(2) (tptz: 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine) (2), Cu(II)(phen)(CH3CN)(2)(ClO4)(2) (3), Cu(II)(phen)(2)(CH3CN)(ClO4)(2) (4), and copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (Cu(II) salt), which were investigated in the context of the water oxidation reaction by electrochemical and related methods. The experiments showed that among these compounds at pH = 11, only Cu(II) salt and 3 led to immediate water oxidation. On the other hand, for stable complexes 1, 2 and 4 even after a few minutes low water oxidation rates were observed. The role of nanosized particles of Cu oxide or Cu ions in electrochemical water oxidation was investigated. Under the water oxidation conditions, the electrode, Cu(II) complexes and Cu(II) salt were studied and a relationship between the stability of the Cu(II) complex and water oxidation rate was suggested. It is proposed that Cu(II) ions or clusters, rather than the starting copper (II) complex or copper(II) oxide, are the true catalysts for the investigated water oxidation process in short-term amperometry. For 3 and in long-termamperometry, CuOx was detected. The experiments showed that a molecular mechanism for the water oxidation reaction in the presence of copper(II) complexes should be carefully analyzed to verify the role of copper ions or cluster formation in the water oxidation reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据