4.5 Article

Preprophase band formation and cortical division zone establishment: RanGAP behaves differently from microtubules during their band formation

期刊

PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1060385

关键词

RanGAP; onion root meristems; preprophase band; confocal laser scanning microscope; microtubule; cortical division zone

资金

  1. JSPS [17207006]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17207006] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Correct positioning of the division plane is a prerequisite for plant morphogenesis. The preprophase band (PPB) is a key intracellular structure of division site determination. PPB forms in G2 phase as a broad band of microtubules (MTs) that narrows in prophase and specializes few-micrometer-wide cortical belt region, named the cortical division zone (CDZ), in late prophase. The PPB comprises several molecules, some of which act as MT band organization and others remain in the CDZ marking the correct insertion of the cell plate in telophase. Ran GTPase-activating protein (RanGAP) is accumulated in the CDZ and forms a RanGAP band in prophase. However, little is known about when and how RanGAPs gather in the CDZ, and especially with regard to their relationships to MT band formation. Here, we examined the spatial and temporal distribution of RanGAPs and MTs in the preprophase of onion root tip cells using confocal laser scanning microscopy and showed that the RanGAP band appeared in mid-prophase as the width of MT band was reduced to nearly 7 mu m. Treatments with cytoskeletal inhibitors for 15min caused thinning or broadening of the MT band but had little effects on RanGAP band in mid-prophase and most of late prophase cells. Detailed image analyses of the spatial distribution of RanGAP band and MT band showed that the RanGAP band positioned slightly beneath the MT band in mid-prophase. These results raise a possibility that RanGAP behaves differently from MTs during their band formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据