4.7 Article

Green synthesis and evaluation of an iron-based metal-organic framework MIL-88B for efficient decontamination of arsenate from water

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 47, 期 7, 页码 2222-2231

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7dt03775a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777119]
  2. Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [17230711600]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse (Tongji University) [PCRRY15007]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron-containing metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have gradually emerged as environmentally benign alternatives for reducing the levels of environmental contamination because of their advantages, such as readily obtained raw materials with low cost, nontoxic metal source with good biocompatibility, and distinguished physicochemical features e.g., high porosity, framework flexibility, and semiconductor properties. In this study, we reported an innovative strategy for synthesizing an iron-based MOF, MIL-88B, at room temperature. The novelty of this strategy was the use of ethanol as solvent and the pretreatment of dry milling with neither the bulk use of a toxic organic solvent nor the addition of extremely dangerous hydrofluoric acid or strong alkali. The synthesized MIL-88B(Fe) was evaluated as a sorbent for removing arsenate in water and it exhibited high adsorption capacity (156.7 mg g(-1)) at a low dosage. The removal capacity of trace arsenate on MIL-88B(Fe) was 32.3 mg g(-1) at a low equilibrium concentration (6.4 mu g L-1), which satisfied the arsenic threshold for drinking water. The results of Fourier transform infrared and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicated that the As(V) molecules bonded with the oxygen molecules, which were coordinated with FeO clusters in the framework. This work presented the potential use of the up-scaled MIL-88B as an excellent sorbent for purifying arsenate-contaminated water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据