4.2 Article

Social support buffering of the relation between low income and elevated blood pressure in at-risk African-American adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 830-834

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9656-z

关键词

Blood pressure; Social support; Income; Socioeconomic status; Buffering; African-American

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [F31AG039930]
  2. National Institute of Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01DK067615]
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01HD072153]
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32GM081740]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Socioeconomic disadvantage has been linked to elevated blood pressure (BP), and the purpose of this study was to assess whether interpersonal social supports buffer these adverse relations in African-American adults. In three communities matched demographically, a subsample of participants (N = 204) of the Positive Action for Today's Health trial provided measures of perceived social support, annual household income, and BP. Multiple regression analyses with cross-product interactions were conducted using follow-up data. The sample had a mean age of 52.8 years (SD = 15.1), and was predominantly female (66 %) with a high body mass index (M = 33.5, SD = 14.7). Results indicated an inverse relation between social support and diastolic BP (B = -.178, p = .005), and also an interaction with income (p = .046), such that higher social support related to lower diastolic BP in the lowest-income individuals (B = -1.05). The same direct (B = -.141, p = .025) and interacting (B = -1.42, p = .040) social support effects were present for systolic BP, however the omnibus model for systolic BP was not significant, F(6, 196) = 1.80, p = .09. The hypothesized buffering effect of social support on the adverse relation of income to BP was partially supported in at-risk African-American adults. Future prevention efforts for reducing the impact of socioeconomic stress on BP may aim to increase perceptions of social support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据