4.5 Review

The Transport Mechanism of Extracellular Vesicles at the Blood-Brain Barrier

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
卷 23, 期 40, 页码 6206-6214

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1381612823666170913164738

关键词

Adsorptive-mediated transcytosis (AMT); blood-brain barrier (BBB); extracellular vesicles (EVs); endothelial cell; exosome; neurodegenerative disease; Parkinson's disease (PD); receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT)

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U01 NS091272, U01 NS082137, P30 ES007033, R01 ES019277]
  2. Micheal J. Fox Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs), like exosomes and microvesicles, have attracted attention as potent carriers of intercellular communication throughout the body, including the brain. They transmit biological signals from donor cells to recipient cells, and recent evidence suggests that they may even carry such signals to distant destinations through peripheral circulation. In the central nervous system (CNS), EVs contribute to maintaining normal neuronal function, as well as to the pathological development of neurodegenerative diseases. Although some evidence has suggested that EVs can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), moving from the peripheral circulation to the CNS, the mechanisms by which EVs facilitate communication between peripheral tissues and the CNS are not well understood. The BBB is a dynamic interface that regulates molecular trafficking between the peripheral circulation and the CNS. However, there is limited mechanistic understanding of how blood-borne EVs cross the BBB under physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we focus on current knowledge of trafficking of EVs between the peripheral circulation and the brain. Moreover, we describe hypothetical transport routes by which EVs may cross the BBB based on previous reports. Further investigation is needed to understand the precise mechanisms by which EVs are transported across the BBB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据