4.4 Review

Current views on the pathogenesis of Sjogren's syndrome

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 215-221

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000473

关键词

ectopic germinal centers; epigenetics; primary Sjogren's syndrome; T-follicular helper cells; T-follicular regulatory cells

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/N003063/1]
  2. EU [731944]
  3. MRC [MR/N003063/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/N003063/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Versus Arthritis [21268] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to provide an insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of primary Sjogren's Syndrome (pSS), highlighting recent findings with potential therapeutic repercussions. Recent findings In the last 2 years, epigenetic analyses provided new insights into pSS pathogenesis. Characterization of DNA methylation patterns, chromatin structures and microRNA confirmed the importance of aberrant interferon and B-cell responses in the development of the disease. The formation of ectopic B-cell follicles with germinal centers is now a well recognized pathogenic mechanism within salivary glands of pSS. In the context of ectopic germinal centers reaction, T/B-cell interactions, that is regarding T-helper 17 and T-follicular helper cells, and their respective counterparts, T-regulatory and T-follicular regulatory cells, appear particularly relevant in pSS pathogenesis as their imbalance is associated with a dysregulation of B-cell dynamics and the production of autoantibodies. Summary Advances in the understanding of pSS pathogenesis have paved the way for clinical trials with novel biologic agents targeting immune pathways regulating T/B-cell interactions and downstream B-cell activation. Reverse translation from these studies provides invaluable novel information of the mechanisms sustaining autoimmunity and chronic inflammation in pSS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据