4.2 Review

Targeting CD47 as a cancer therapeutic strategy: the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma experience

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 332-337

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000468

关键词

anti-CD47; cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; human SIRP; innate immune checkpoint inhibitor

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA033572]
  2. NCI [R00CA201075]
  3. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DFS-22-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewTo describe the relevance of CD47 in the tumor microenvironment and summarize data on anti-CD47 therapies, including its role in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).Recent findingsCD47 is expressed on all normal cells and targets SIRP on the surface of myeloid cells. However, CD47 is found to be overexpressed on cancer cells. CD47-SIRP interaction inhibits macrophage phagocytosis, allowing cancer cells to escape immune surveillance. Current focus in immunotherapy has been targeted toward inhibiting CD47-SIRP interaction via anti-CD47 antibodies. This activates innate immunity, promoting cancer cell destruction by macrophages. It also activates adaptive immunity resulting in antigen-presentation, mostly by dendritic cells, leading to antitumor cytotoxic reactions. Current CD47 antagonists undergoing clinical trials include Hu5F9 (an anti-CD47 antibody that directly inhibits the CD47-SIRP interaction) and TTI-621, (a fusion protein composed of CD47 binding domain of human SIRP and linked to the Fc region of IgG1). These agents have continued to show strong efficacy against solid and hematological tumors.SummaryIn the CTCL tumor microenvironment, increased immune checkpoint inhibition expression via CD47 bound to SIRP correlates with a more advanced disease state. Continued success in treating these patients requires further studies on CD47 antagonists, specifically when combined with other antibodies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据