4.4 Review

Knowledge of HPV/cervical cancer and acceptability of HPV self-sampling among women living with HIV: A scoping review

期刊

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 E73-E82

出版社

MULTIMED INC
DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3855

关键词

Women living with HIV; HPV; cervical cancer; self-sampling; scoping review

类别

资金

  1. OHTN-CIHR New Investigator Award Priority Announcement in HIV/AIDS (Health Service/Population Health Research) [129974]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cervical cancer rates are disproportionately high among women living with the human immunodeficiency virus (WLHIV). Cervical cancer is preventable through HPV screening, regular Pap tests, and early cancer detection. Evidence indicates that HPV and cervical cancer screening are suboptimal among WLHIV, who face a myriad of access barriers. Considering that screening is an effective first-line defense to cervical cancer, we conducted a scoping review with the aim of gaining a better understanding about: (1) the knowledge and perceptions of HPV and cervical cancer screening among WLHIV; and (2) the acceptability of self-sampling for HPV among WLHIV. We searched five electronic databases for peer-reviewed articles that were published in English within the last ten years, reported on studies with hiv-positive women who were aged 16 or older, and satisfied the topics of the review. A total of 621 articles were found. After accounting for duplicates and unmet criteria, 17 articles and 1 abstract, reporting on studies in the United States and Africa, were included in this review. The review highlighted that most WLHIV had inadequate knowledge of HPV transmission and cervical cancer prevention, which influenced their perceptions of risk and susceptibility. Screening barriers included misconceptions about Pap tests, fear of diagnosis of serious illness, perceived pain, embarrassment, bodily modesty, and limited access to female health care providers. This review also affirms that self-sampling is an acceptable and promising screening option for WLHIV. Implications for policy, research, and practice are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据