4.8 Article

Arctic Geese Tune Migration to a Warming Climate but Still Suffer from a Phenological Mismatch

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 15, 页码 2467-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.077

关键词

-

资金

  1. NWO (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) [NPP 866.13.010]
  2. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship [301108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate warming challenges animals to advance their timing of reproduction [1], butmany animals appear to be unable to advance at the same rate as their food species [2, 3]. As a result, mismatches can arise between the moment of largest food requirements for their offspring and peak food availability [4-6], with important fitness consequences [7]. For long-distance migrants, adjustment of phenology to climate warming may be hampered by their inability to predict the optimal timing of arrival at the breeding grounds from their wintering grounds [8]. Arrival can be advanced if birds accelerate migration by reducing time on stopover sites [9, 10], but a recent study suggests that most long-distance migrants are on too tight a schedule to do so [11]. This may be different for capital-breeding migrants, which use stopovers not only to fuel migration but also to acquire body stores needed for reproduction [12-14]. By combining multiple years of tracking and reproduction data, we showthat a long-distance migratory bird (the barnacle goose, Branta leucopsis) accelerates its 3,000 km spring migration to advance arrival on its rapidly warming Arctic breeding grounds. As egg laying has advanced much less than arrival, they still encounter a phenological mismatch that reduces offspring survival. A shift toward using more local resources for reproduction suggests that geese first need to refuel body stores at the breeding grounds after accelerated migration. Although flexibility in body store use allows migrants to acceleratemigration, this cannot solve the timeconstraint they are facing under climatewarming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据