4.7 Review

Alleviating the energy & safety contradiction to construct new low sensitivity and highly energetic materials through crystal engineering

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 20, 期 13, 页码 1757-1768

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ce01993a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Scientific Challenge Project [TZ-2018004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673210, 11602241, U1530262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low sensitivity and highly energetic materials (LSHEMs), with both high energy and sufficient safety, are highly desired in practical applications. With respect to energy and safety, as the two most important and hottest concerns in the field of energetic materials (EMs), it is extensively deemed that there is an inevitable and inherent contradiction between them: a higher energy goes with a lower safety. This is the so-called energy and safety (E&S) contradiction. This article highlights this contradiction and finds that this contradiction is structure-level dependent. That is, it appears most necessarily and remarkably as an inherent one only at the molecular level, while at the crystal level and other higher ones, it can be largely alleviated. Moreover, we think that the energy and safety originate from the thermodynamics and kinetics of the decomposition reactions of EMs, respectively, and accordingly the contradiction becomes a thermodynamickinetic one. We thereby propose a strategy for developing LSHEMs, i.e., increasing the energy by increasing the chemical energy stored in molecules and by enhancing the molecular packing compactness, while, enhancing safety by making external stimuli more and more insufficient to ignite the EMs, through crystal engineering and mixing technologies. As an intrinsic structure of EMs, the crystal packing with face-to-face pi-pi stacking supported by strong interlayered intermolecular interactions favors the formation of LSHEMs or it is proposed to enhance intermolecular interactions and the anisotropy of these interactions to build low impact sensitivity energetic crystals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据