4.6 Article

Childhood Body Weight in Relation to Morbidity From Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer in Older Adulthood: 67-Year Follow-up of Participants in the 1947 Scottish Mental Survey

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 182, 期 9, 页码 775-780

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwv154

关键词

body mass index; body weight; cancer; cardiovascular disease; cohort study; life course; morbidity

资金

  1. United Kingdom cross-council Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Initiative
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. MRC [G1001401] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G1001401, MR/K026992/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although it has been well documented that elevated body weight in middle-and older-aged populations is associated with multiple morbidities, the influence of childhood body weight on health endpoints other than coronary heart disease is not well understood. Accordingly, using a subsample of 4,620 participants (2,288 women) from the Scottish Mental Survey of 1947, we examined the association between body mass index measured at 11 years of age and future risk of 9 independent health endpoints as ascertained from national hospital admissions and cancer registers until 2014 (up to age 77 years). Although there was some evidence of a relationship between elevated childhood body mass index and higher rates of peripheral vascular disease (per each 1-standard deviation increase in body mass index, hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.07, 1.37) and smoking-related cancers (per each 1-standard deviation increase in body mass index, hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.17), there was no apparent association with coronary heart disease, stroke (including ischemic stroke), heart failure, or carcinomas of the colorectum, stomach, lung, prostate, or breast. In conclusion, a relationship between childhood body weight and later morbidity was largely lacking in the present study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据