4.3 Article

Vitrification, not cryoprotectant exposure, alters the expression of developmentally important genes in in vitro produced porcine blastocysts

期刊

CRYOBIOLOGY
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 70-76

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.12.001

关键词

Cryopreservation; IGF2; IGF2R; Imprinted gene; In vitro produced embryo; Porcine blastocyst; Vitrification

资金

  1. Westmead Fertility Centre
  2. University of Sydney's Faculty of Veterinary Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vitrification of embryos is common practice in advanced livestock breeding programs and in human fertility clinics. Recent studies have revealed that vitrification results in aberrant expression of a number of stress related genes. However, few studies have examined the effect that vitrification has on developmentally important genes, and none have been conducted in porcine embryos. The aim of this study was to determine the effects that different vitrification procedures and cryoprotectant combinations have on the expression of imprinted genes in in vitro produced (IVP) porcine blastocysts. The transcript levels of insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) were lower in all groups of vitrified blastocysts compared to that in non-vitrified control blastocysts (P < 0.05). Expression levels of IGF2 and IGF2 receptor (IGF2R) in blastocysts that had been exposed to cryoprotectants without being vitrified were similar to that in non-vitrified control blastocysts (P > 0.05). Furthermore, blastocysts vitrified using ethylene glycol and propanediol combined, and those vitrified in a closed device, had IGF2R transcript levels similar to that in non-vitrified control blastocysts (P > 0.05). In conclusion, vitrification, but not exposure to cryoprotectants, caused aberrant expression of the imprinted genes IGF2 and IGF2R. Vitrification protocols that incorporated propanediol or a closed device were found to be least disruptive of gene expression in IVP porcine blastocysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据