4.7 Review

Novel approaches for chemical and microbiological shelf life extension of cereal crops

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 59, 期 21, 页码 3395-3419

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1491526

关键词

Cereal grains; microbial shelf life; mycotoxins; bio-preservatives; cold plasma; electrolyzed water

资金

  1. Irish Government under the National Development Plan 2007 - 2013 through the research program FIRM/RSF/CoFoRD
  2. Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Economic losses due to post-harvest fungal spoilage and mycotoxin contamination of cereal crops is a frequently encountered issue. Typically, chemical preservatives are used to reduce the initial microbial load and the environmental conditions during storage are controlled to prevent microbial growth. However, in recent years the consumers' desire for more naturally produced foods containing less chemical preservatives has grown increasingly stronger. This article reviews the latest advances in terms of novel approaches for chemical decontamination, namely application cold atmospheric pressure plasma and electrolyzed water, and their suitability for preservation of stored cereal crops. In addition, the alternative use of bio-preservatives, such as starter cultures or purified antimicrobial compounds, to prevent the growth of spoilage organisms or remove in-field accumulated mycotoxins is evaluated. All treatments assessed here show potential for inhibition of microbial spoilage. However, each method encounters draw-backs, making industrial application difficult. Even under optimized processing conditions, it is unlikely that one single treatment can reduce the natural microbial load sufficiently. It is evident that future research needs to examine the combined application of several treatments to exploit their synergistic properties. This would enable sufficient reduction in the microbial load and ensure microbiological safety of cereal crops during long-term storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据