期刊
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 46, 期 10, 页码 1585-1591出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003261
关键词
quality measures; sepsis; sepsis bundles; septic shock; SEP-1
资金
- Prevention Epicenters Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U54CK000484]
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [K08HS025008]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- CDC/National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD)
- CDC/NICD
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- NIH
- Worrell
- Pursuit Vascular
- CareFusion/Becton Dickinson
- Pfizer
- CDC Prevention Epicenters Program [U54CK000484, U54CK000164]
- CDC
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Objectives: Many septic patients receive care that fails the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' SEP-1 measure, but it is unclear whether this reflects meaningful lapses in care, differences in clinical characteristics, or excessive rigidity of the all-or-nothing measure. We compared outcomes in cases that passed versus failed SEP-1 during the first 2 years after the measure was implemented. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Seven U.S. hospitals. Patients: Adult patients included in SEP-1 reporting between October 2015 and September 2017. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Of 851 sepsis cases in the cohort, 281 (33%) passed SEP-1 and 570 (67%) failed. SEP-1 failures had higher rates of septic shock (20% vs 9%; p < 0.001), hospital-onset sepsis (11% vs 4%; p = 0.001), and vague presenting symptoms (46% vs 30%; p < 0.001). The most common reasons for failure were omission of 3- and 6-hour lactate measurements (228/570 failures, 40%). Only 86 of 570 failures (15.1%) had greater than 3-hour delays until broad-spectrum antibiotics. Cases that failed SEP-1 had higher in-hospital mortality rates (18.4% vs 11.0%; odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.19-2.80; p = 0.006), but this association was no longer significant after adjusting for differences in clinical characteristics and severity of illness (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.85-2.18; p = 0.205). Delays of greater than 3 hours until antibiotics were significantly associated with death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.62; p = 0.038), whereas failing SEP-1 for any other reason was not (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.72; p = 0.674). Conclusions: Crude mortality rates were higher in sepsis cases that failed versus passed SEP-1, but there was no difference after adjusting for clinical characteristics and severity of illness. Delays in antibiotic administration were associated with higher mortality but only accounted for a small fraction of SEP-1 failures. SEP-1 may not clearly differentiate between high- and low-quality care, and detailed risk adjustment is necessary to properly interpret associations between SEP-1 compliance and mortality.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据