4.5 Article

Cenomanian-Turonian ammonite successions in the Tinrhert Basin (Southeastern Algeria): Revision and new data

期刊

CRETACEOUS RESEARCH
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 337-374

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.09.011

关键词

Cenomanian; Turonian; Ammonoidea; Systematic; Bio-events; Paleo-biogeography; Tinrhert; Algeria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Cenomanian Turonian succession (C-T) outcropping in the Tinrhert Basin, in the southeastern part of Algeria, has been the focus of many studies since the turn of the 19th century. In the present research, new C-T sections have been scrutinized over a distance of approximately 300 km, from Gour Ben Houilet in the west to Oued In Adaoui in the east. More than 1.700 ammonites and nautilids were collected bed-by-bed and 30 taxa subsequently identified; these are systematically described and illustrated herein. Thirteen of them [Placenticeras cf. kaffrarium Etheridge, Metengonoceras dumbli (Cragin), Calycoceras (Proeucalycoceras) sp., Pseudaspidoceras pseudonodosoides (Choffat), Vascoceras aff. glabrum (Barber), Rubroceras burroense Cobban, Hook and Kennedy, Fagesia peroni Pervinquiere, Eotissotia simplex Barber, Hoplitoides wohltmanni (Von Koenen), Kamerunoceras turoniense (d'Orbigny), Choffaticeras sp., Choffaticeras meslei (Peron), and Choffaticeras sinaiticum Douville] are recorded from the Tinrhert area for the first time. This study also evidences that both subspecies Neolobites vibrayeanus vibrayeanus (d'Orbigny) and Neolobites vibrayeanus brancai Eck are associated in the same section and in the same level. In the Tinrhert area, the biostratigraphic ammonite successions are subdivided into nine bio-events that are easily correlatable with the upper Cenomanian-lower Turonian standard zonation. The paleobiogeographic affinities of the recorded taxa characterize these ammonoid assemblages as part of the southern Tethyan Province during the early Late Cretaceous. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据