4.5 Article

Ammonites, inoceramids and stable carbon isotopes of the Cenomanian-Turonian OAE2 interval in central Europe: Pecinov quarry, Bohemian Cretaceous Basin (Czech Republic)

期刊

CRETACEOUS RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 150-173

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.04.013

关键词

Mid-European cretaceous; OAE2 interval; Palaeontology; Geochemistry; Stratigraphic correlation

资金

  1. internal project of CGS [321620]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [17-10982S]
  3. Czech Academy of Sciences research programme [AV0Z30120515]
  4. Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic [DKRVO 2017/04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a well-exposed succession of Cenomanian through lower Turonian strata at Pecinov (Bohemian Cretaceous Basin, Czech Republic), a detailed study of ammonite and inoceramid assemblages was undertaken for the first time and combined with a revision of physical and carbon-isotope stratigraphy. The upper Cenomanian part of the OAE2 interval yielded a relatively rich ammonite assemblage containing Metoicoceras geslinianum (d'Orbigny, 1850), Calycoceras (Calycoceras) naviculare (Mantell, 1822), Pseudocalycoceras angolaense (Spath, 1931), Lotzeites aberrans (Kossmat, 1895), Euomphaloceras septemseriatum (Cragin, 1893), Sciponoceras gracile (Shumard, 1860), Allocrioceras annulatum (Shumard, 1860) and ? Puzosia sp. Inoceramid bivalves include Inoceramus pictus J. de C. Sowerby, 1829, Inoceramus sp. aff. Mytiloides praeturonicus Troger, 2015 and Inoceramus cf. bohemicus Leonhard. 1897 in the Cenomanian part of the succession. The subspecies concept of the Inoceramus pictus group is modified here. The occurrence of Mytiloides puebloensis Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2000 indicates the lowermost Turonian Watinoceras devonense Zone. Earlier interpretation of the positive carbon-isotope excursion is refined here and a combined bio- and chemostratigraphic correlation is presented to successions from the Western Interior Seaway and the British Chalk. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据