4.5 Article

Last major gap in scydmaenine evolution filled (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

期刊

CRETACEOUS RESEARCH
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 62-68

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.10.026

关键词

Fossil; Cretaceous; Scydmaeninae; Scydmaenini; Evolutionary gap

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501874, 41602009, 41688103, 91514302]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB18000000]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20161091]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [15YF1408700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tribe Scydmaenini represents one of the most successful modern groups of the ant-like stone beetles (Scydmaeninae), displaying a high degree of species diversity (>750 species) and morphological disparity. Surprisingly, direct fossil evidence crucial for elucidating the origin and early evolution of Scydmaenini is lacking. This gap of knowledge is of particular interest as the Cretaceous origin of other major scydmaenine lineages, e.g., Mastigini, Eutheiini, Cephenniini, and Clandulariini, were recently documented. Here, we report a new genus and species, Kuaju borealis gen. et sp. nov., from Cretaceous Burmese amber, pushing back the oldest definitive record of stem-group Scydmaenini to approximately 99 Ma. An affinity of the new taxon with recent Scydmaenini is strongly supported by the beetle's short, dome-like terminal (fourth) maxillary palpomeres, as well as an exposed metanepimera which are typical character states of the tribe. However, Kuafu possesses a plesiomorphic un-notched anterior margin of the scape, a character state unknown among living Scydmaenini, and suggesting a basal position of the fossil taxon. Our find provides firm evidence that stem-group Scydmaenini, like other major scydmaenine lineages, originated no later than the mid-Cretaceous, removing the possibility that Scydmaenini may had a young, Quaternary origin. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据