4.7 Article

The vaginal microbiome is stable in prepubertal and sexually mature Ellegaard Gottingen Minipigs throughout an estrous cycle

期刊

VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13567-015-0274-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ellegaard Gottingen Minipigs A/S
  2. CitoxLab Scantox A/S

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the pig has been introduced as an advanced animal model of genital tract infections in women, almost no knowledge exists on the porcine vaginal microbiota, especially in barrier-raised Gottingen Minipigs. In women, the vaginal microbiota plays a crucial role for a healthy vaginal environment and the fate of sexually transmitted infections such as Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Therefore, knowledge on the vaginal microbiota is urgently needed for the minipig model. The aim of this study was to characterize the microbiota of the anterior vagina by 16 s rRNA gene sequencing in prepubertal and sexually mature Gottingen Minipigs during an estrous cycle. The dominating phyla in the vaginal microbiota consisted of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteriodetes and Tenericutes. The most abundant bacterial families were Enterobacteriaceae, unclassified families from Gammaproteobacteria, Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Paenibacillaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Syntrophaceae. We found a higher abundance of Lactobacillaceae in the prepubertal Gottingen Minipigs compared to sexually mature non-pregnant Gottingen Minipigs. However, correlation tests and diversity parameters revealed a very stable vaginal microbiota in the Gottingen Minipigs, both before and after sexual maturity and on different days throughout an estrous cycle. The vaginal microbiota in Gottingen Minipigs was not dominated by lactobacilli, as it is in women and according to our results the minipig vaginal microbiota is very stable, in opposite to women. These differences should be considered when using the minipig as a model of the genital tract in women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据