4.6 Article

Separate mechanisms for number reading and word reading: Evidence from selective impairments

期刊

CORTEX
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 176-192

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORPORATION OFFICE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.010

关键词

Number reading; Number syntax; Morphology; Learning disabilities; Dyslexia

资金

  1. Bettencourt-Schueller Foundation
  2. Israel Science Foundation [1066/14]
  3. Human Frontiers Science Program [RGP0057.201]
  4. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Cognition and its Disorders [CE110001021]
  5. Azrieli Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Do number reading and word reading use the same cognitive mechanisms? We examined this question through the looking glass of dissociations between impairments in number and word reading. We report two women with selective deficits in number reading, who read words normally. An examination of their impairment pattern indicated that the specific locus of their number reading deficits is in processes that handle the number's structure: both were impaired in parsing a digit string into triplets, and one of them was also impaired in generating the number's verbal structure. In contrast to their structural deficits in number reading, their word reading was completely intact, including the structural processes in word reading (morphological analysis and assembly). We present this dissociation in the framework of a broader effort to examine dissociations between specific components in number and word reading. We went beyond general word-number dissociations: we used detailed cognitive models for word reading and for number reading, and analyzed them in order to identify which components of the number reading process are homologous to which components of words reading. We then show that even these homologous processes are dissociable: an examination of previously reported dissociations, completed by the case studies presented here, indicated that each of the specific homologous sub-processes of word/number reading can be selectively impaired. We conclude that although the word and number reading pathways show much similarity, they are almost entirely separate. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据