4.4 Article

Optimal Design of Galvanic Corrosion Protection Systems for Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures

期刊

CORROSION
卷 74, 期 7, 页码 829-841

出版社

NATL ASSOC CORROSION ENG
DOI: 10.5006/2688

关键词

corrosion protection; lifetime; optimal design; wind turbine support structure

资金

  1. Innovation Fund Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current work addresses a mass/cost-optimization procedure for galvanic anode cathodic protection systems based on both cathodic protection (CP) standards and numerical simulation. An approach is developed for optimizing the number and dimensions of the galvanic anodes, distributing the optimized anodes on the support structure, and finally evaluating the protective potential on the structure during the lifetime by using finite element (FE) software. An algorithm based on sequential quadratic programming is used for optimizing the number and dimensions of the anodes. Both simplified and detailed models are suggested for calculating the protective potential on the structure. The simplified model is selected based on its advantages in terms of calculation time and compatibility with DNV standard data. A time-dependent FE model is used to take into account the electrical isolation degradation of the structure coating as well as the mass reduction of the anodes during the CP lifetime. The performance of the proposed optimization process is examined on a mono bucket inspired (with some simplifications) by the Dogger Bank metrological mast in England. The optimized designs for different coating and anode types are compared and the best designs in terms of both cost and protective potential during the lifetime are suggested. The achieved results show that the proposed optimization procedure can reduce the cost of the CP system around 70% compared to the original non-optimized CP design of the Dogger Bank metrological mast. Furthermore, evaluating the time-evolution performance of the CP systems can reduce their lifetime uncertainty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据