期刊
JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 146-156出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022466914525239
关键词
single-case experiment; single-subject experimental design; single-subject research; effect size; statistical analysis; randomization; randomization test
资金
- Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO)
Reporting standards and critical appraisal tools serve as beacons for researchers, reviewers, and research consumers. Parallel to existing guidelines for researchers to report and evaluate group-comparison studies, single-case experimental (SCE) researchers are in need of guidelines for reporting and evaluating SCE studies. A systematic search was conducted for quality standards (QSs) for reporting and/or evaluating SCE studies. In total, 11 unique QSs were retrieved. In this article, we discuss the extent to which there is agreement with regard to randomization and data analysis of SCE studies among the 11 proposed sets of QSs. We provide recommendations regarding the inclusion of a randomization and data-analysis standard.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据