4.5 Article

A dynamic feasibility analysis of public investment projects: An integrated approach using system dynamics and agent-based modeling

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1863-1876

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.002

关键词

Public investment projects; Dynamic feasibility; System dynamics; Agent-based modeling; Integrated approach

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2011-0030814]
  2. Ministry of Public Safety & Security (MPSS), Republic of Korea [B0101-15-222] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20130012638] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasingly, public sector investment projects face a dynamic environment that incorporates both macroscopic system and microscopic individuals. Prior attempts to analyze the feasibility of those projects, however, have been subject to limitations in accommodating such environmental changes. As a remedial measure, the combination of system dynamics (SD) and agent-based modeling (ABM) is proposed due to their complementary strengths. Consequently, this paper suggests a new approach to dynamic feasibility analysis for public investment projects through an integrated simulation model using SD and ABM. The former SD part elucidates the relationships among system elements that constitute project's benefits and costs, while the latter ABM part depicts users' emergent behavior with their heterogeneity. A bridge construction case study demonstrates the applicability of the proposed approach. The findings show that the proposed approach can provide a valuable and flexible framework for analyzing project feasibility in a dynamic environment. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据