4.5 Article

Regulation of contact sensitivity in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice by innate immunity

期刊

CONTACT DERMATITIS
卷 79, 期 4, 页码 197-207

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13046

关键词

contact sensitivity; dendritic cells; non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse; Toll-like receptor; Tregs

资金

  1. Diabetes Mouse Core of DK [P30-11-015]
  2. National Science Center [UMO-2012/05/B/NZ6/00997]
  3. NIH [DK092882DK100500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Genetic background influences allergic immune responses to environmental stimuli. Non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice are highly susceptible to environmental stimuli. Little is known about the interaction of autoimmune genetic factors with innate immunity in allergies, especially skin hypersensitivity. Objectives: To study the interplay of innate immunity and autoimmune genetic factors in contact hypersensitivity (CHS) by using various innate immunity-deficient NOD mice. Methods: Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2-deficient, TLR9-deficient and MyD88-deficient NOD mice were used to investigate CHS. The cellular mechanism was determined by flow cytometry in vitro and adoptive cell transfer in vivo. To investigate the role of MyD88 in dendritic cells (DCs) in CHS, we also used CD11c(MyD88+) MyD88(-/-) NOD mice, in which MyD88 is expressed only in CD11c(+) cells. Results: We found that innate immunity negatively regulates CHS, as innate immunity-deficient NOD mice developed exacerbated CHS accompanied by increased numbers of skin-migrating CD11c(+) DCs expressing higher levels of major histocompatibility complex II and CD80. Moreover, MyD88(-/-) NOD mice had increased numbers of CD11c(+) CD207(-) CD103(+) DCs and activated T effector cells in the skin-draining lymph nodes. Strikingly, re-expression of MyD88 in CD11c(+)DCs (CD11c m Y degrees 88. MyD88(-/-) NOD mice) restored hyper-CHS to a normal level in MyD88(-/-) NOD mice. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the autoimmune-prone NOD genetic background aggravates CHS regulated by innate immunity, through DCs and T effector cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据