4.7 Article

A comparative study on early-stage strength development and mechanical properties of cement emulsified asphalt mixture using brake pad waste

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 515-523

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.013

关键词

Brake pad waste; Cement emulsified asphalt mixture; Early-curing behavior; Moisture resistance; Overlay tester; Repeated semi-circular bending test

资金

  1. Science Project of Department of Education of Hubei Province [B2017056]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Department of Transportation of Hubei Province [2017-538-1-10]
  3. Science Foundation of Wuhan Institute of Technology [K201846]
  4. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology [SYS112018-22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to investigate the feasibility of using brake pad waste (BPW) in cement emulsified asphalt mixture (CEAM). The effects of BPW filler on early-stage strength, mechanical properties and durability of CEAM were experimentally studied, while mixtures with basic oxygen furnace (BOF), fly ash (FA), hydrated lime (HL) and conventional limestone filler (LF) were prepared and tested as comparison. Results indicate that strength of BPW mixture in early stage and after fully cured are smaller than that for the contrasting mixtures with common by-product fillers. The reason might be that BPW filler has no significant effect on hydration reaction of cement, due to its non-active characteristic. However, the engineering performance of BPW mixture is comparable to that with artificial by-product fillers. Moreover, result of dynamic modulus test implies that the temperature and frequency dependence of CEAM is weaker than the HMA. And there is no obvious difference in viscoelastic characteristics of CEAM mixes using various fillers concerned. The research demonstrates that BPW filler can be used as an alternative material for mineral filler in CEAM. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据