4.7 Article

Development of new pH-adjusted fluorogypsum-cement-fly ash blends: Preliminary investigation of strength and durability properties

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 646-656

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.086

关键词

Fluorogypsum; Fly ash; Portland cement; Compressive strength; Modulus of elasticity; Poisson's ratio; Volumetric expansion; Response surface model

资金

  1. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries [724534]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper develops a new low-cost construction material made of pH-adjusted fluorogypsum, class C fly ash, and type H Portland cement. The proposed fluorogypsum-based blend is durable in water and has a lower weight and lower cost than ordinary concrete. A preliminary investigation of strength and durability properties of this new construction material is also presented. A series of compressive strength tests and volumetric expansion measurements were conducted on specimens after 28 days of curing. The experimental results were used to develop response surface models. These models can be used to predict accurately compressive strength and volumetric expansion as functions of the relative content, in dry weight, of different components. The response surface models were employed to determine ranges of dry components of the system with sufficient strength and limited volumetric expansion. A composition with 62% pH-adjusted fluorogypsum, 35% fly ash, and 3% Portland cement was selected based on strength and volumetric expansion properties to conduct additional experimental studies to quantify its modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio, setting times, density, void contents, and curing time effects on strength and volumetric expansion. The investigation results suggest that the proposed fluorogypsum-based blend is a promising low-cost concrete-like material for use in outdoor and underwater construction applications. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据