4.7 Article

Environmental aspects and pavement properties of red mud waste as the replacement of mineral filler in asphalt mixture

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 605-613

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.268

关键词

Asphalt mastic; Red mud; Leaching toxicity; High-temperature properties; Pavement

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017 M622207]
  2. Special Funding for Postdoctoral Innovation Project in Shandong Province [201702011]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures (Wuhan University of Technology) [SYSJJ2018-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The red mud waste generated from the alumina refining industry, which remains high alkalinity and problematic pollutants, is occupying considerable land resource and causing significant environmental problems worldwide. Instead of landfills, the utilization of the red mud waste as a substitution of mineral filler in asphalt pavement mixtures has been investigated in this study. The physical and chemical properties of the red mud waste were first characterized. The experimental tests including softening point, penetration, dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) and multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) were then conducted to evaluate the properties of asphalt mastic. Based on the results on leaching toxicity and radioactivity, the red mud waste had no risk to be used as a building material. Moreover, the addition of red mud waste can improve the stiffness and elasticity of asphalt mastic. The increased rutting parameter and the decreased accumulated creep strain were further found, especially the Sintering RM. In addition, the Sintering RM had the capability to improve the elastic recovery of asphalt mastic, while the Bayer RM had limited contribution to this behavior. Consequently, the red mud waste can be concerned as a secondary resource to replace the natural mineral filler for asphalt pavements. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据