4.7 Article

Stability of a new geopolymer grout: Rheological and mechanical performances of metakaolin-fly ash binary mixtures

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 420-436

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.025

关键词

Grout; Bleeding; Soil reinforcement; Geopolymer; Metakaolin; Fly ash; Packing density; Rheology; Elastic proprieties; Shrinkage

资金

  1. Erasmus mundus (Eu-METALIC II) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolution of technical and environmental requirements fosters the development of geopolymer based grouts for soil reinforcement. Geopolymer based materials actually have several advantages but the improvement of their rheological performances remains a challenging task, as the raw materials, especially sodium silicate and metakaolin, do not have favorable properties and the main chemical admixtures used to optimize cement-based materials have not been found compatible. As mix-design takes into account the performances in both fresh and hardened states, a comprehensive study is necessary to develop geopolymer grouts based on metakaolin-fly ash-stabilizer mixtures. Fly ash allowed reducing the viscosity and increasing the setting time and the stabilizer provided the fresh mixes with better homogeneity and stability. At constant liquid to solid ratio, the packing density of the powders actually increases with fly ash proportion. Fly ash affected the mechanical properties, especially at replacement rates of 40% and higher, due to combined effects of reduced reactivity and higher packing density of the powders. This could be shown by a new methodology combining the monitoring the elastic properties with isothermal calorimetry for understanding the early-age behavior and the distinction between the geopolymerization stages. The addition of xanthan gum had a beneficial effect on the stability of grouts, by acting on the activation solution without having any significant effect on the geopolymerization reaction. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据