4.7 Article

Ultimate bending capacity evaluation of laminated bamboo lumber beams

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 365-375

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.058

关键词

Laminated bamboo; Tangential bending direction; Radial bending direction; Bending moment; Deflection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51308301]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiang-su Province [BK20130978]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2015 M580382]
  4. Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project [1501037A]
  5. Open Fund Project from Key Laboratory of Concrete and Pre-stressed Concrete Structure of Ministry of Education (Southeast university)
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to evaluate the bending capacity of laminated bamboo lumber (LBL) beams, material performance tests and beam tests have been carried out. A strain-stress relationship is proposed based on compression and tensile tests conducted parallel to the grain. Two failure modes are identified based on the locations of cracks in the beam specimens. Direction of bending and the location of internal joints are shown to influence the mechanical properties of LBL beams. Internal joints have more influence on specimens under tangential bending (where the culms are bent across their width) than that under radial bending (where the culms are bent across their thickness). Irrespective of the bending direction, the strain across the cross-section of the laminated bamboo beam is shown to be linear throughout the test process, following standard beam theory, Based on this theory and the proposed simplified strain-stress relationship for the beam, calculation approaches for the ultimate bending moment and ultimate bending deflection are proposed for three bending failure modes which give a good agreement with the test results. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据