4.7 Article

The pore fillability of cementitious materials and its application in predicting compressive strength of gap-graded blended cements

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 805-817

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.091

关键词

Pore fillability; Cementitious material; Gap-graded blended cement; Compressive strength; Porosity

资金

  1. National key research and development program [2016YFB0303502]
  2. Guangdong special support for Youth Science and Technology innovation talents [2015TQ01C312]
  3. Pearl River Science and Technology Nova Program of Guangzhou [201610010098]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project [2014B020216002]
  5. Water conservancy science and technology of Guangdong Province of China [2016-23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To utilize cementitious materials efficiently, pore fillability was defined as volume expansion of cementitious materials during hydration, and calculated according to its chemical shrinkage and non-evaporable water content. Relationship between hydration characteristics of cementitious materials and porosity of cement pastes was established, and then the compressive strength of gap-graded blended cements was predicted based on the pore fillability of cementitious components and initial solid volume concentration of cement pastes. The results showed that the pore fillability of cementitious materials increased dramatically with the increase of hydration time and the decrease of particle size. For a given hydration degree, pore fillability of cementitious materials mainly dominated by the size of fraction, fine fraction presented a much higher pore fillability than coarse fraction as outer products contribute to a higher proportion in the hydration products. The compressive strengths measured and predicted were consistent with each other very well, indicating pore fillability can be used for the strength prediction of gap-graded blended cement (within 2.5% deviation). (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据