4.7 Article

Thermal and fire risk analysis of low pressure on building energy conservation material flexible polyurethane with various inclined facade constructions

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 449-456

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.027

关键词

Energy saving; Low air pressure; Flexible polyurethane; Heat feedback; Building facade

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0803300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506059]
  3. Educational Commission of Anhui Province of China [KJ2017A499]
  4. Huaqiao University Scientific Research Foundation of China [16BS801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the factors affecting the fire safety analysis of the common construction material flexible polyurethane foam, based on combustion at various inclination angles and the ambient pressures at the altitudes of the cities of Hefei (99.8 kPa) and Lhasa (66.5 kPa). The effects of ambient air pressure, specimen width and inclination angle on the burning rate (as determined by mass loss), average flame spreading velocity, flame temperature and flame length were examined. The combustion rate was lower at 66.5 kPa and the wider specimens exhibited gradual spreading of the flame front in conjunction with melting and dripping. The burning rates at various inclinations were found to correlate with the pressure according to the expression m alpha p(n), 0.67 < n < 1.36, and this result can be explained based on pool fire theory. The average flame spreading velocity was found to correlate with pressure at various inclinations according to the relationship Va alpha p(n), 2/3 < n < 1. The flame temperature was also observed to increase somewhat at the lower pressure, leading to an increase in the flame puffing frequency. Finally, a power law was used to describe the relationship between flame height and pressure, while a linear relationship was obtained between the index and the angle of inclination. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据