4.7 Article

Evaluation of cracking properties of SBS-modified binders containing organic montmorillonite

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 196-205

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.185

关键词

Asphalt binder; Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS); Organic montmorillonite; Cracking performance

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015B11614]
  2. Foundation of Guangxi Key Laboratory of road structure and materials [2015gxjgclkf-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, organic montmorillonite (OMMT) has become a popular additive for the Styrene-Buta diene-Styrene (SBS) modified binder to improve its storage stability. Though many studies have examined the effect of OMMT additive on asphalt performance, little research has focused on the cracking properties of SBS/OMMT-modified binders. In this study, SBS/OMMT-modified binders for asphalt were first produced using five SBS contents of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% and then blended with 3% OMMT additives. First, FTIR and XRD tests were performed to verify the structure of the asphalt/SBS/OMMT. Then, the intermediate-temperature fatigue cracking property was determined by the G*sin delta of pressure aging vessel (PAV) specimen through a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) test, while the low-temperature cracking performance was characterized by the creep stiffness and m-value for the unaged, short-term aged, and long-term aged specimens through bending beam rheometer (BBR) tests. The results show that the OMMT/SBS modified asphalt has formed an intercalated structure and a nanocomposite. The compound modification of OMMT and SBS generally exhibited more intermediate-temperature cracking resistance than that of the single SBS-modified bitumen, but the influence of SBS and OMMT is statistically insignificant. Both SBS and OMMT play key roles in determining the m-value, and higher SBS contents lead to a lower stiffness under three aging conditions at low temperatures. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据