4.0 Review

Roles of Rheb(S16H) in substantia nigra pars compacta dopaminergic neurons in vivo

期刊

BIOMEDICAL REPORTS
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 137-140

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/br.2014.397

关键词

Rheb(S16H); glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor; brain-derived neurotrophic factor; neuroprotection; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean government [2008-0061888, 2012R1A1A1039140]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1A1039140] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although there are ongoing intensive research efforts, no effective pharmacological therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD) have been developed thus far. However, with the development of efficient gene delivery systems, gene therapy for PD has become a focus of research and increasing evidence suggests that continuous production of neurotrophic factors play a significant role in the functional restoration of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic (DA) system. Our recent study reported that the transduction of DA neurons with ras homolog enriched in brain, which has an S16H mutation [Rheb(S16H)], protected the nigrostriatal DA projection in a neurotoxin model of PD in vivo. In addition, Rheb(S16H) expression significantly increased the levels of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which contributed to the neuroprotective effects of Rheb(S16H) in DA neurons in the adult brain, indicating that the activation of the signaling pathways involved in cell survival by a specific gene delivery, such as Rheb(S16H) to adult neurons, may be a useful strategy to protect neural systems in the adult brain. In the present study, a brief overview of our recent studies is provided, which demonstrates the neuroprotective mechanisms of Rheb(S16H) on the nigrostriatal DA projection in the adult brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据